Starmer's Shadow - Part 1
A nation cast its shadow into the sea of the collective abyss as if it were a net. Starmer was their catch. Who is this strange fish? Let's read between the lines and investigate Starmer's Shadow.
Introduction:
This is the first time I’ve decided to write an article. In it, I attempt to present my experience of being exposed to the narrative—or rather, the media’s portrayal—of Keir Starmer, and my interpretation of that portrayal. This does not mean I believe everything written here to be true. Instead, I wanted to explore what might emerge if we reversed the narrative and began linking certain alleged events and significant figures in the story of the UK Prime Minister’s rise to power.
(Note from the Author): When I started writing this, Starmer hadn’t yet completed his first year in Downing Street. He has now resigned (fully as of the 20th of July), not even two years in, yet nothing has changed, he will be replaced. The party isn’t finished; they are scrambling to raise a new leader — the same party that chose Starmer because of how driven he was to destroy the country and the people he was meant to serve. Starmer had played his part well. Now we’ll dissect some of the reasons he became leader in the first place and how he was able to get into Number 10.
What began as a homage to the work of Dr. Sean Hross soon took on a life of its own. I began to understand Starmer as a person, his conscious self and his unconscious, his childhood and parental upbringing evolving into a broader journey of discovery as I researched organisations I’d long been curious about. This piece is a collection of ideas I’ve strung together in an attempt to understand where we—Britain—may have begun our current path of self-destruction. I came to see Starmer as a kind of focal point—a figure through whom I could trace the contours of a one-world system, its secretive leading entity, widespread institutional corruption, the role of the occult, and the presence of wolves in sheep’s clothing. It wasn’t just the psychological implications of this portrayal that struck me, but the psychic ones as well. In investigating him—his psyche, his past, his present, and what may lie ahead—I found a lens through which to examine the wider system and how it effects us bio-psychically, as well.
It is from here that we hope to offer some ways for us — individually — to rise up out of the quagmire we have waded into, to attain higher grounding and reclaim our sovereignty. Whether it means talking to our MPs and establishing a dialogue that secures our connection to the people who represent us in their court, or getting in touch with our bodies, our psychology, our unconscious drives, and the trauma that irritates them — trauma which, when neglected, causes us to default to megalomaniacal abusers who are hellbent on the destruction of the nations they serve and, by that token, themselves in the process.
Shadow
Silence in the courtroom, silence in the streets—justice is asleep.
A distinct feeling of Orwellian unease, marred by EMR fog that fatigues a nation. A nation at war with itself, and at the helm: someone who has as little faith in himself as his voters do.
It’s Easter 2025. Nature is calling—coming back with a vengeance, as a mini heatwave announces itself to Britain’s winter-worn eyes. The Prime Minister holds a mandate for experimentation, aiming to secure a climate in the UK where the seasons never change, a perpetual winter—a one season world. He seizes the natural warming cycle of the Sun, now in a solar maximum, as an opportunity to pedal the Climate Change agenda.
He signs off on a “lockdown of the sky” through official tests, publicly announcing their scheme to fog the heavens and black out the Sun. Over the past decade—if not longer—people have at least heard of, and in many cases witnessed, the testing of experimental climate-modifying technologies, even if they’re reluctant to admit it.
Starmer seems determined to cast a shadow over England—a shadow in the form of electrical blackouts, following his push for solar energy devices in a so-called “rooftop revolution” that will ultimately fail to yield enough power. This may become his legacy: a black mark etched into the annals of Britain’s history.
England—and the rest of the UK—will be far from green then, especially as solar radiation–modifying technologies, long warned about for their destructive effects on plant life that feed on sunlight, begin to take their toll. That’s if he hasn’t already turned half of England’s countryside into notoriously low yield “Solar Farms” by then.
Starmer the Shadow’s Puppet
A peculiar aspect of Keir Starmer’s role as Prime Minister is illuminated through the lens of Jungian psychology. Carl Jung might have seen him as a figure possessed by the Shadow—his own, and ours. Put another way, the Prime Minister is not separate from the people he governs. Our public perceptions and ignorances, our neuroses, and our unresolved conflicts with both our collective identity and our individual selves all contribute to something Jung called Shadow Projection, otherwise for this discussion— the collective Shadow projections of the UK population.
In Jungian psychology, the accepted explanation of the Shadow goes something like this: the “Shadow” refers to the unconscious, often repressed aspects of the personality that we resist acknowledging or accepting. When we project our Shadow onto others—especially onto groups like a “crowd” or authority figures such as a “ruler”—we are, in effect, seeing our own faults and bad behaviour reflected in them, rather than confronting them within our own psyche.
The previous explanation may seem brief—perhaps even understated. The extent of psychic transference involved in the UK’s collective projections remains largely unexplored and warrants deeper investigation.
To begin, let us state quite plainly: everyone who resides in the UK, whether in great measure or small, contributes to the persona of Keir Starmer. He is part of us, and we are part of him. Some may recoil at this idea, others may sink into it, and some may even grieve—but the fact remains that, unconsciously, we have all played a role in manifesting Starmer as our nation’s leading representative.
All our self-loathing, all our self-destructiveness, masochism, dysmorphia, and lack of identity along with the prescribed hatred of our native culture is poured into this man. Years of propaganda, pettiness towards ones neighbours, trust plummeting in society and our communities, fostering a culture of neglect towards maintaining healthy family connections, embracing a culture of infantilisation, hedonism and affluence.
To underscore the significance of the Shadow in this dynamic, it is essential to clarify what Carl Jung meant by the “Shadow”— taking into account other groundbreaking theories such as Rupert Sheldrake’s Morphic Field Resonance—and why this archetype is so relevant in understanding how rulers like Starmer are chosen and entrusted with power.
The Shadow Aspect of Starmer and Our Projections
In Jungian psychology, the “Shadow,” “Id,” or shadow aspect/archetype may refer to the entirety of the unconscious—that is, everything of which a person is not fully aware. In short, the Shadow represents the unknown side of the personality, even to the individual themselves.
This is the lens through which we intend to examine Keir Starmer: that which he may—or may not—already know about himself and how his Shadow side is weaved into the Shadow projections of the nation.
The characteristics of Shadow Projection are largely shaped by shame—those hidden aspects of an individual’s personality deemed “unacceptable” and tucked away into the recesses of the mind. The Shadow cannot be destroyed; even when repressed into darkness, its tentacles inevitably surface. The people of England project their Shadow onto their Prime Minister, as every nation’s population does—like the tentacles of a giant octopus rising from the murk to seize a scapegoat grazing near the lake’s edge.
England — and the whole UK — has become more anti‑psychological than even America, unwilling to look at its own repressed turmoil and neurosis. To make matters worse, we are also physically unhealthy as a nation: a people who hate their own bodies, at best discreetly masochistic, at worst dissociative and willing to disown the body completely.
If England and the other UK countries had not become so unsanitary psychologically, then perhaps we would not have succumbed to such a vampiric personality. If we had not repressed our instincts to rebel against — and repel — such a vicious attack on the nation by the Fabians, after more than a hundred years in which they have operated, then we might have chosen a better leader to serve us. However, we ignored our instincts.
Thus it was Starmer who emerged out of the swamp, like Grendel — only this time because we ignored our Beowulf archetype, our heroic instinct, which told us: No. I will not be trampled on by the swamp‑dragon’s offspring and acolyte. These hallowed halls of gold and silver will hear laughter again, and I will defeat this monster.
Instead, as a nation, we allowed those who manage both sides of the political scale to play us — and to trample on our homes and bones.
People will hate Starmer for being a soulless, slippery villain — a hatred he likely feeds on. Yet the same people will cheer for a football team in a Premier League match: a collective sublimation of tension. Some over‑emphasise the importance of tribalism, fuelled by politics, gambling, when critical of the sports enterprise media franchise.
However, the tensions released here are unconscious — the tension and strain of traumatised bodies — and not merely the tribal tensions that psychoanalysts of football often espouse. Crowd‑seekers seek the crowd to immerse their ego in an ocean of other voices, so they can escape themselves.
They hate Starmer because he is the Everyman—exactly like them. He needs the crowd, and they need him. Starmer loves a good footy match.
The shadow in Jungian psychology is both a personal and a phylogenetic concept, incorporating the personal unconscious and collective unconscious. It includes the repressed parts of an individual’s life, but also a “collective shadow” that represents the repressed aspects of society and humanity passed down through a collective inheritance.
This is not a supernatural entity lurking in another dimension. It is something woven into the psychosocial fabric—connecting us, person to person. Everyone who pays attention to the ritual, who invests energy, time, and emotion, becomes part of it. It ripples through the subatomic threads that bind the human race, like roots stretching through the earth—connecting, communicating— subconsciously.
Rupert Sheldrake helped to visualise the Shadow when he theorised the existence of the Morphic Field, giving a more scientific name to the phenomenon. Conscious of his Jungian leanings he supplements Jung’s original idea with a mental diagram of something alive and under the surface of waking conscious reality, a reality much of us spend all of our lives unaware of. Sheldrake postulates that Society is an organism.
“The idea that human society is an organism is extremely widespread; it is perhaps one of the most common metaphors extending throughout the history of Western thought. It exists in our language in phrases such as the body politic, head of state, arm of the law. These are organic metaphors which imply the unified, organic nature of society…Even in 17th-century political thought, which was far more atomistic in tone, philosopher Thomas Hobbes compared society to a leviathan, a great monster, using still another organic metaphor…
The concept of morphic fields containing in-built memory helps to explain many features of society: for example, there are traditions, customs, and manners which enable societies to retain their organizing principles - their autonomy, pattern, structure, and organization - even though there is a continuous turnover of individuals through the cycles of birth and death. This is similar to the way in which the morphogenetic field of the human being coordinates the entire body even though the cells and tissues within the body are continuously changing…
There are certain contexts in which social memory not only becomes conscious but is actually invoked in all societies; this is through ritual…
So rituals have a kind of deliberate and conscious evocation of memory, right back to the first act. If morphic resonance occurs as I think it does, this conservatism of ritual would create exactly the right conditions for morphic resonance to occur between those performing the ritual now and all those who performed it previously. The ritualized commemorations and participatory re-linking with the ancestors of all cultures might involve just that; it might, in fact, be literally true that these rituals enable the current participants to reconnect with their ancestors (in some sense) through morphic resonance.
…A view of paradigms as morphic fields helps us to understand why they are so strongly conservative in nature, for once the paradigms are established, there is a large social group contributing to the consensual reality of the paradigm. A very powerful morphic resonance is evolved by this way of doing things; and that is why paradigm changes tend to be rather rare, and why they meet with strong resistance.
Ruper Sheldrake - Part II - Society, Spirit & Ritual: Morphic Resonance and the Collective Unconscious
I asked researcher Alfred Obersteiner who coined the subject Somatology, a question— a student of Sheldrake’s work, after I found out we had shared an overlap in areas of research and had come to similar conclusions.
Nate:
What makes Starmer capable of overseeing the cover up of sexually abused children in Britain?
The morphic field is the collective shadow, is it not?
How does is the morphic field express its dis-ease through him?
Alfred:
While many people use traumatic experiences as a force for creation — like Antonio Gaudí, Prince, or Freddie Mercury — others, like Keir, Zelensky, Stalin, and the Austrian painter, often choose to connect themselves to the morphic field of destruction.
This is especially true for people who have no other talents through which to express themselves and be “seen.”
The longer they remain in that field, the more its resonance changes the person’s entire biology, eventually making them possessed by it.
Alfred sees trauma, specifically the trauma Keir Starmer suffered as a child as the main factor for his malignancy and also a significant factor as to how Starmer was able and willing to plug into the Morphic field, conscious or not, of the way a part of himself interacted with and fed from the orchestral hopes dreams, dreads and nightmares of a nation.
More from Alfred in this Part 1 of our exploration soon.
The questions that arise from the points above are as follows: What aspects of the UK population have contributed to the creation of Starmer as Prime Minister? Which institutions played a role in his rise to power—particularly those unfamiliar to the wider public? We’ll explore how these institutions are aware of— and build their policies on manipulating populace organism to project its Shadow onto a head of government and use that to their benefit.
We will also investigate the psychological health of the UK as a whole, and ask: does the nation’s collective mental and emotional state influence the intensity and severity of its Shadow projections?
Furthermore, what is it about Keir Starmer that makes him such a fitting vessel—a carrier—for this collective dark psychic energy? What traits has he gained in the course of his life, strange as it appears, to allow him to absorb and reflect the unconscious material of a nation destablised?
What does he not know about himself? Or put another way: what unconscious weight is he carrying that qualifies him for the role?
Another way of looking at it: karma is what you don’t yet know about yourself. So—what other roles has Starmer taken on, consciously or not, beyond that of ruler, which allow him to act out his karma?
Because one tends to reject or remain unaware of the least desirable aspects of their personality, the Shadow represents the darkness within—a dimension often which can often be experienced as undesirable, even malignant.
However, there are also positive traits that may remain hidden in the Shadow, especially in individuals with low self-esteem, anxiety, or false beliefs. These qualities are projected outward, again unconsciously.
In Starmer’s case, these positive aspects might include his well-dressed appearance, his composure under fire, his ability to enunciate clearly, and his capacity to appear authoritative—winning over a crowd not through charisma, but through the projection of traits the public may not fully own in themselves; what they want their Prime Minister to look and sound like.
Contrary to the Freudian definition, the Jungian Shadow encompasses everything outside the light of consciousness. “Everyone carries a Shadow,” Jung wrote, “and the less it is embodied in the individual’s conscious life, the blacker and denser it is.”
The Shadow may partly represent our link to primitive instincts—those superseded in early childhood by the emerging conscious mind, or even encounters with archetypes of rites of passage. What happens to those instincts under the influence of controlling parents—or worse—and the shaping forces of society itself?
England/ the UK has many facets that its inhabitants would rather deny or ignore than confront—let alone integrate. Yet integration is one of the central aims (or at least it should be) when psychoanalysts delve into a person’s life in an effort to alleviate neurosis. Just as the individual must face their shadow to heal, so too must a nation reckon with its disavowed truths.
Pathological altruism has permeated the UK, and England in particular has witnessed its traditions trampled—often with the complicity of those meant to protect them. Historic and heritage sites have been gate kept, made increasingly difficult to access. Ordinary Brits are dying out, and the emerging generation doesn’t recognise this as pathological altruism, this is Change. Successive waves of newcomers from foreign lands have diluted the British population, and in many places, Britain now looks unrecognisable. Few dare to speak out—no one wants to offend the newcomers and their soldiers the state discreetly payrolls and publicly allows to run amok defending them.
With the newer generations of the ’80s and ’90s replacing the elderly of more traditional times—raised on constant propaganda promoting multiculturalism—there is little fight left, and even fewer willing to lead a lawful charge against the immigration crisis and the policies that enabled it.
These policies have been perpetrated against the country and its people for more than half a century. For millennials, this is how it is—and how it has always been.
The experiment worked: psychologically, young people today are accustomed to the chaos and malaise of cities flooded with multi-ethnic strangers, and to the collective pretence that everything is normal.
Even Jordan Peterson— a liberal talking-head and philosophy professor— was recently on record saying to Piers Morgan:
“look at the state of your country which is dreadful. If you guys in the UK understand how sad it is for us in Canada and in the United States to watch what you’re doing to yourself. I mean the UK is a great country. When I go, I go to Oxford, I go to Cambridge, to these remarkable places in London. I see your unbelievable deep history, understand how much world owes the UK in terms of say the establishment of common law and decent government everywhere, including places like India. We owe places like the UK such a debt, and to watch you guys spiral yourselves into the ground for this idiot weak political correctness that’s gone so far that can allow your working class women to be raped on mass sadistically and say nothing about it and gaslight people who are telling the truth, and it’s so sickening, it’s so demoralising, it’s almost unspeakable.”
Few Brits realise- the situation was orchestrated this way—to steadily foster a new way of thinking. Thought-policing, or even better, self-thought-policing, has conditioned them to believe that mass immigration is a good thing: that it will help the economy, enrich our culture by blending it with others, and increase the numbers of our dwindling population to somehow revitalise Britain. All the while, it ignores the reality that England will no longer resemble anything familiar to the forebears of the ’50s, ’60s, and even the ’70s—many of whom have died or are in the process of dying, some allegedly as a result of the COVID jab. One can only imagine the daily shock of seeing England as it is now through their eyes. I don't want to imagine.
There is a pattern for the way these agendas like the Covid pandemic are implemented, to make their true objectives as ambiguous as possible, and we have a tendency to pretend what is being done to us is ok, or to deny it completely and if we can’t then what we ask for is a spoon full of a sugar to help medicine go down.
The past few years has seen article after article talking about everything so-called conspiracy people were talking about from the very beginning about the Corona era and its fallout being published.
Independent news organisations such as UK Column, alternative research sites as well e.g. Unslaved.com, Richard Hall from RichPlanet.com plus their frequent contributors were on the case day-one and well before in lots of ways.
It was said that the COVID jab was safe, that lockdowns would be lifted, and that it would allow people to go out again and revitalise the economy. A similar promise was made for the transition to a greener economy — one that has, in effect, taken away people’s access to fuel and fuel-based industries. Coal, one of the most abundant energy sources in England — especially in the North — has been sidelined, abandoned. Meanwhile, we look to China and see how its economy has thrived, in no small part due to cheap and plentiful energy from coal. Since data centres have been on the rise in this country, we have seen and heard less about Climate Change, and people are beginning to notice.
Now, utility costs have reached an all‑time high, driven by the proliferation of electric vehicles and a wave of technological advancements such as digital currency, which is expensive to operate and demands vast resources to power. Government data centres are opening everywhere across the country, especially in the North of England.
The increasing number of super‑server data centres is particularly concerning, because these buildings require exponential amounts of storage space and electricity, consuming as much energy and water as a town. These centres will eventually be used to house the machinery powering digital currency, and perhaps even the digital governance of the UK through “AI” entirely.
As of a few weeks ago, a second data centre has been announced for construction in Northumberland — this time in Blyth — driving utility prices sky‑high, especially during hot weather. Those servers won’t cool themselves; best get the pions to pay for some of it with blackouts and price hikes.
There is little, if any, cheap fuel like coal being extracted to power the stations responsible for maintaining the ever-increasing demand on the electric grid. Instead, people are paying more for expensive alternatives like biomass — which, in some cases, involves chopping down entire forests just to heat their homes, wind farms which are unreliable and solar farms—even more unreliable still and have to artificially stabilised because of how unstable they are.
Ordinary people are being exploited as costs skyrocket. The solution lies beneath their feet, yet they won’t fight for it — not because they lack courage, but because they don’t know what to fight for. No one has taught them what is truly precious, or how to foresee a way to prosper in the future. Instead, they’ve been “educated” to look the other way, trained to distract themselves.
Where is the foresight? We could be designing the cleanest, most efficient, and most affordable coal power stations — but instead, untold millions are poured into frivolous social causes. We could be building our economy up, yet we seem intent on tearing it down.
Despite society’s technological progress, ignorance has deepened to such an extent its as if the UK has regressed a hundred years in intelligence, the depression can be felt all around.
And once again — you guessed it — the climate change agenda is kept very vague and counter intuitive to make it as easy to swallow as the last “cure”, because lets face it, we wanted to be told we were muck, we wanted to be told people were evil and deserve a nuclear holocaust reset, just like so many of us wanted to take the Covid injections, family members have even told me “I needed something to believe in”, their suicide-sacrifice to a death cult eludes them but their subconscious drives betray their ignorance.
How else were Extinction Rebellion ever allowed to operate here? We’re told we must treat the climate, as if the planet itself were a patient in need of medical attention. We are the reason the planet is sick of course and we must sacrifice ourselves so the planet can live. The planet is dying, so we have to medicate it— just as was done during the lockdowns and the rollout of the jabs.
Once this medicating and locking-down of the sky is complete, we will save mankind from his shameful crime of polluting the Earth — by further polluting both Earth and sky, and by blacking out the Sun.
Anyone familiar with Ralph Ellis and his peers’ work debunking the climate change narrative knows that Net Zero isn’t about removing carbon from the atmosphere — it’s about removing you and me from the equation. That’s the true meaning behind carbon neutrality.
Plants feed on carbon dioxide — we learn this in comprehensive school! England will be anything but green if we lower CO₂ levels in the air. It’s astonishing that this even needs explaining. On this basis alone, we as a species should embrace carbon — as Walter Russell describes in his writings, “the God particle” — and stop demonising it. Otherwise, we may one day wake to find ourselves afraid to exhale our own breath.
A similar scenario unfolded during the rise of equality movements such as Black Lives Matter and Trans/LGBTQ activism. These movements, at times, were perceived as hostile — especially toward Western men, who were increasingly portrayed as the root of society’s ills. The prescribed cure? If it’s not toxic masculinity, it’s racism — here’s your medicine get on your knees, white man. And that’s precisely what Keir Starmer did. He publicly supported the Black Lives Matter movement and took the knee alongside his deputy, Angela Rayner.
We have swallowed jagged pills, each leaving a bitter aftertaste. This did not happen by accident—it happened because we, the British public, grew complacent. We allowed a Prime Minister to remain in office despite kneeling before an organisation that openly admits to practising voodoo and black magic. We allowed it. We watched. And we did nothing.
We have blithely gone along with the climate change agenda, lulled by guilt and the illusion of sole responsibility. We let them convince us that we alone bear the weight of the planet’s ills—and then we let them get away with it, without protest. How lofty a plane we exist on in the Western world— we alone have made the planet sick, and we alone will fix it! (because China certainly won't).
The UK, we’re told, has the worst rates of racism and homo/transphobia—so naturally, the solution must be ever more permissive attitudes toward debauchery, especially when it involves children. Because we are so irredeemably racist, we must welcome endless waves of newcomers, and then teach the rest of the world to follow our example. Never mind that many of these cultures are among the most intolerant on Earth—we, the worst offenders, have somehow become the global ambassadors of peace through multiculturalism.
Collectively, we as a nation have projected our complacency and pathological tolerance onto a willing vessel—he becomes possessed by our deepest ignorance. There is a reason the Vatican reports such high rates of “demonic” possession. In Italy alone, some 500,000 alleged cases are recorded annually. The Catholic faith, with its epicentre in Italy, acts almost like a sinkhole for global Catholic repression—a spiritual drain where the sinful thoughts and buried evils of the ordinary believer are ritually prayed away, only to gather and fester.
Wilhelm Reich’s work was revolutionary in its vision of the human being as an antenna—both a transmitter and receiver of frequency—sustained by the life-affirming force he called orgone. He proposed that when this vital energy is depleted, the body becomes vulnerable to harmful frequencies, which may manifest as disease. Perhaps it is true: we are transmitters, and our emissions ripple outward, shaping the collective field of human consciousness.
Perhaps the shadow, when as festered as it gets, will become so strong and powered mostly by low frequency diseases caused from a culture of repression, that it actually possesses a child, who is has not fully developed all the faculties for immunity against such peculiar forces at work.
These forces find an outlet. They psychically attach to a host, manifesting as what we call demonic possession. But figuratively, the afflicted is a volcano—venting steam from the overheated depths of the collective unconscious, which must express itself somehow. This is not the work of spirits from another realm, but a psychic force—an emergent phenomenon born of collective cognitive dissonance. It would also seem as if the afflicted had a choice in the matter.
When enough people behave strangely, when too many wires cross, something short-circuits. And when a mass of believers ritually pray their sins away, that repression doesn’t vanish—it condenses, distorts, and erupts elsewhere. Alucarda (1977) also known as “Daughter of darkness” explores this implicitly, along with others like it, capturing the fevered atmosphere where faith, hysteria, and psychic overflow collide, and the monstrous forms the Shadow can take. Is darkness not shadow also?
Jung, speaking from the context of 1936 and witnessing the Führer rise to power said that Hitler is “obviously “posessed” [and] has infected a whole nation to such an extent that everything is set in motion and has started rolling on its course towards perdition.”
In this passage, Jung is indeed talking about Hitler’s unconscious possessing him, and when the underlying chords resonate with one whole group of people chiming with that same chord. When these underlying chords are struck and echoed across a population, they generate immense psychic energy. That energy seeks an outlet, often through projection onto a group that embodies the traits a society cannot bear to acknowledge in itself, including those traits the people secretly wished they had.
As a people, we have cultivated a deep self-loathing—toward ourselves and toward our kin. This disavowed energy has also seeped into Starmer’s psychic field. It is not something readily admitted by the British public, but it shapes the atmosphere nonetheless. He absorbs and reflects a collective discomfort, a refusal to confront what we have denied. And it speaks volumes about Britain’s psychological state.
It may be that Keir Starmer is merely a mirror for what we cannot accept in ourselves, or he could be something more, what Jung called the Ergriffener —one who is seized by an archetypal force, drawn from inside Starmer’s psyche by the collective Shadow. The word Führer itself seems to fuse fury and father, and because of our repressed rage and buried hatred towards our fathers and mothers, we are unconsciously begging for the Führer to take charge—spurring Starmer on to embody the role of Big Daddy Dictator, just as the German people once collectively urged Hitler to take up the mantle.
Wotan’s Return
Then again, we are not the only country grappling with the problem outlined above. Germany harbours some of the deepest self-loathing complexes—complexes that compelled Angela Merkel to slither forward as a vessel for the Shadow.
This is the same woman who, during a live TV broadcast following an election victory, threw away the German flag after catching one of her party colleagues waving it in celebration. God forbid one should wave their own flag at a national election win ceremony.
Of course, it wouldn’t be the first time the German people have allowed reprehensible figures to represent them. Speaking on the topic of Wotan—an archetype of the Germanic psyche—in relation to the hysteria surrounding Hitler, Jung says:
“He is a fundamental attribute of the German psyche, an irrational psychic factor which acts on the high pressure of civilisation like a cyclone and blows it away.... a god has taken possession of the Germans and their house is filled with a “mighty rushing wind.”
Carl Jung - Wotan
Alice Miller observed this kind of possession in European families as well. In her case study on Germany—and in her research into other European countries such as Switzerland—she found not only high levels of child abuse, but systems that were thorough and deliberate in their task of turning children into obedient slaves. Dr. Miller’s analysis, though not framed in the same terms as Jung’s, touches on similar psychic dynamics. Jung did not describe possession as metaphysical, but rather as a psychological phenomenon, as did Miller. Alice Miller saw that Adolf Hitler was projecting his hatred onto the Jews—a malice brewed in his heart from unexpressed torment suffered in childhood, and carried with him throughout adulthood.
It wasn’t just Hitler. Miller argues that the German people of that era shared the same sordid upbringing—children’s spirits broken daily, relentlessly, without reprieve. They too were looking for someone to kill, and found their father figure in Hitler. Institutionalised and riddled with Stockholm Syndrome, the herd looked to him to put them in line, just as father and mother had, and to tell them where to point the gun.
There are always people who flock to figures like these, just as a crowd flocks to a hypnotist’s show. They want to be hypnotised—even though they’re already halfway there, if not fully. So they will someone like Hitler to emerge, to help them take the plunge—seeking out the most authoritarian ruler and witch-finder general, rather than re-evaluating the situation they find themselves in as individuals. And if they did follow that trail, they would have arrived at a nation steeped in abject poverty and rampant debauchery, the result of deep-rooted corruption.
What have we done to our children? Never mind the atrocious evils children were subjected to during the COVID years—locked indoors over a supposed hoax, forced to wear masks, their social development stunted, their bodies confined. We’ve blithely sent them to training camps—otherwise known as schools—with dumbed-down curriculums, overcrowded classrooms and school yards, and authoritarian teachers. We’ve subjected them to vaccines, to sick and subversive ideologies, and to the relentless demand to conform: first to school rules, then to parental rules, and finally to society’s rules.
Much of this may be done accidentally, or even with good intentions. But then there are the malicious parents—those who do all of the above deliberately, and who abuse their children for their own gratification. It’s a problem that remains painfully present in the UK.
Needless to say, the main difference between Starmer and Hitler is that Hitler was venerated by the German people as a saviour, whereas Starmer is so widely disliked he is far from deified. Still, there are parallels: instead of leading a crusade to exterminate the Jews, Starmer is a perpetrator in the ongoing annihilation of the very nation he claims citizenship of.
Then there is the question of why Starmer lets slip a Nazi slogan every now and then. On September 29, 2021, Keir Starmer delivered his first in-person keynote speech as Labour Party leader at the party’s annual conference in Brighton.
During his conference speech today – summarised by one wag as ‘spend 17 years getting ready for work and learning to follow the rules, then the rest of your life working and following the rules’ – Keir Starmer quoted ‘the beauty of work’ as a driving force for what passes for his ‘vision’s the UK.
Starmer attributed his idea to Auden – but in fact the ‘beauty of work’, ‘Schönheit der Arbeit’, was the slogan of a propaganda department of the nazi regime from 1934 to 1945:
Along with its sister organisation Strength through Joy, which promoted large families to secure ‘Aryan’ domination, SA aimed to keep the population in what its rulers considered their place.
Skwark Box - Starmer’s ‘beauty of work’ was a nazi propaganda slogan
The question now, of course, is: does he even realise he is doing it? Was this perhaps a form of dog‑whistling, foreshadowing what was to come—as we shall see toward the end of this section of the article?
Who knows—perhaps it was part of some kind of programming, a Manchurian‑candidate scenario, something that will be explored further in subsequent parts of this series.
Starmer, as the possessed, does not necessarily become uncontrollable. In fact, it could be argued that he possesses us in turn—much like a virus operates: once it reaches saturation during its gestation period, it begins to spread. The thing is, viruses are a normal part of what the immune system must contend with. So what does it say about us, that the majority of this country’s people voted him in? It’s almost as if our collective focus on him lends more power to the virus—amplifying division, especially when he agitates us into outrage. You could say Covid left us vulnerable to attack by this “virus”, making the perfect Petrie dish to fester enough inertia in the collective morphic field to allow this slime creature to slither through the political grate.
Alfred Obersteiner sees the possessed, seized spirit of Starmer as having its wellspring in his childhood, as others have suggested. I have spent the better part of a year and a half researching this and have come to the same conclusion.
As always, it starts in childhood.
He simply wanted to be acknowledged and to have the proper attachment as a child.
He never received it from either of his parents.
As a son, this also left him with a sense of powerlessness — he had no way to make his father truly see him as his son.
So he began searching for a way to force his father to notice him.
His mother’s suffering and constant need for attention created in him a deeply dysfunctional relationship with women in general, and fostered a hidden hatred toward her.
Becoming a lawyer and his subsequent rise in politics was the perfect vehicle for finally being seen and acknowledged as a person of importance.
Of course, he never truly felt satisfied by this craving for recognition — he simply kept climbing higher.
The higher he rose, the more perfectly his Fabian controllers played him.
If he wanted to climb further and fill those childhood holes, he was asked to turn himself into a subversive force of destruction.
He now finally has the power he always craved.
An entire nation is forced to suffer the same pain he felt growing up. Women and children being raped, beheadings, stabbings, and mass poverty mean nothing to him.
Alfred Obersteiner
Obersteiner and I both looked at the case of Starmer and formulated similar theories and conclusions independently (we only heard of each other little more or less than six months ago) that Starmer was capable of overseeing and facilitating the simultaneous cover-up of the Rape Gang Scandal, because of his childhood trauma. This also explains why he allowed Jimmy Savile to get away with the legacy of child abuse and flagrant debauchery, like targetting disabled children’s wards which Savile was given special access to because of his status.
Further unpacking of Starmer's family issues in the second part of this article.
The scenario highlighted previously, namely the seemingly deliberate setting-up of Starmer's image as the reverse Hitler may even been fabricated with that purpose—structured as it is in Parliament and Whitehall—to cast the government as the enemy. There have been too many provocations to suggest otherwise, and who knows what might finally spark the British public to realise the state as its foe, and how they might retaliate. That, in turn, could provide the perfect conditions to test out a full martial law scenario—something that could be sustained for years, much like the semi-martial law regime of the COVID lockdowns. Those years were a testing ground, not for if, but when such measures would need to be implemented. It wouldn’t be surprising if, in the same year Digital IDs are put into force, something of the sort will unceremoniously be put into operation. As we shall see, Starmer and those his ilk are more than happy to give over control of the UK to the WEF’s Fourth Industrial Revolution a.k.a. Industry 4.0, characterised by the rapid integration of technologies like artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things (IoT), robotics, and gene editing.
This of course would involve doing away with the government entirely, Agnes Sammut said it succinctly, in paraphrasing: “the World Economic Forum, and UN development programmes and private think tanks are gearing up for Post-Nation governance. A future without borders and politicians fade replaced by algorithmic management, smart cities run by code, resources distributed by digital overseers. AI not just assisting the government but being the government.” He makes a point that this wouldn’t be such a bad thing, if it was neutral, it could lead to fairness and decisions made without the mud of human corruption slowing down the process. “A control system you can’t opt out of, can’t question, can’t even see. The EU has already passed laws for AI oversight boards, The UN’s 2030 Agenda speaks of automated monitoring of resources and populations. Defence departments are testing predictive governance models as we speak. The collapse in governments is not an accident it’s a set up.” This explains then why the government has set up these “leaders” to be boogie men we love to hate, which confirms the transhumanist vision outlined above. That is why they have flooded the UK with immigrants, why they have persecuted the UK population, hounding them for acting on their natural instinct to protect their nation, their homes. Economy destroyed, currency devalued their industry stripped and outsourced.
If anything, Starmer’s steadfastness in orchestrating a controlled collapse of the UK is hard to ignore—whether it’s laying the groundwork for martial law or something else entirely. The speed and precision with which it’s unfolding may well be the reason he was chosen. But then, who exactly is they? This would be the Fabian Society, of course. We will continue this thread in Part 3.
(Note by the author) Thankfully, since revisiting this article to finish the work, it appears that some are beginning to wake up and organise a response to the Fabian regime government. Record numbers of Labour councils in the North of England are losing control to Reform UK, breaking Labour’s hold over the region, and there is widespread talk of Restore UK being even more promising for head of government.
UK Column remain critical of Rupert Lowe, as is their place, yet perhaps — like Trump — it would be better to have someone like Lowe in power than an Andy Burnham or a Starmer, whose resignation has been tendered and who is about to exit 10 Downing Street.
It remains to be seen whether these developments will produce the results so urgently needed to counteract the tyranny of the British State, the EU, and the UN/WEF. With Europe beginning to retreat from its own migrant policies, needing somewhere to offload its burdens, England — you and I — must act: contacting MPs, supporting those within the system who you would have represent you, or better yet, representing yourself and your ward.
References
Alice Miller - For Your Own Good
Carl Jung - The Undiscovered Self
Rupert Sheldrake - Part II - Society, Spirit & Ritual: Morphic Resonance and the Collective Unconscious
Alfred Obersteiner’s Substack
https://substack.com/@alfredobersteiner
Starmer is a WEF puppet
https://www.americanpartisan.org/2024/07/keir-starmer-is-a-wef-puppet/
Starmer’s “Beauty of work was a nazi slogan”
https://skwawkbox.org/2021/09/29/starmers-beauty-of-work-was-a-nazi-propaganda-slogan/
The Occult Spirituality of Black Lives Matter
https://crisismagazine.com/opinion/the-occult-spirituality-of-black-lives-matter
Skwark Box - Starmer’s ‘beauty of work’ was a nazi propaganda slogan
https://skwawkbox.org/2021/09/29/starmers-beauty-of-work-was-a-nazi-propaganda-slogan/
Jimmy Saville Takes Young Girl To Prince Philip.
Labour’s Rooftop Revolution (Solar power farce)
Contradictory rhetoric conflating patriotism with Green Agenda
Ralph Ellis’ paper on CO2 levels throughout history
https://friendsofscience.org/assets/documents/ice_ages_v12b_Ellis.pdf
Top 10 biggest solar farms in the UK
https://www.solarpowerportal.co.uk/utility-scale-solar/the-top-10-biggest-solar-farms-in-the-uk
This article is phenomenal! Definitely worthy of reading and sharing.